<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (4) TMI 139 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299702</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s decree, and reinstated the decrees of the Munsif and Subordinate Judge, thereby decreeing the suit in favor of the plaintiff with costs throughout. The judgment underscored the special protection afforded to pardhanashin ladies under Indian law and clarified the correct application of the burden of proof in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (4) TMI 139 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299702</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s decree, and reinstated the decrees of the Munsif and Subordinate Judge, thereby decreeing the suit in favor of the plaintiff with costs throughout. The judgment underscored the special protection afforded to pardhanashin ladies under Indian law and clarified the correct application of the burden of proof in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>