<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Order on Section 54B Deduction Upheld: No Error or Revenue Prejudice Found, Revision u/s 263 Unnecessary.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61129</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - claim for deduction u/s 54B - the assessment order cannot be termed as “erroneous”. There is no material on record indicating that the appellant had not satisfied the conditions laid down under the provisions of the Act for claiming exemption u/s 54B of the Act. Therefore, the assessment order cannot be branded as “erroneous” and “prejudicial to the interests of the revenue”. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:38:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Order on Section 54B Deduction Upheld: No Error or Revenue Prejudice Found, Revision u/s 263 Unnecessary.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61129</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - claim for deduction u/s 54B - the assessment order cannot be termed as “erroneous”. There is no material on record indicating that the appellant had not satisfied the conditions laid down under the provisions of the Act for claiming exemption u/s 54B of the Act. Therefore, the assessment order cannot be branded as “erroneous” and “prejudicial to the interests of the revenue”. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:38:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>