<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299699</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the complaint under section 138 of the NI Act was time-barred as it was filed beyond the prescribed period. The Court clarified that the 15-day period for payment starts from the date the notice is received by the drawer or deemed served if returned unclaimed. In this case, the complaint was filed after the limitation period, and thus, it was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299699</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the complaint under section 138 of the NI Act was time-barred as it was filed beyond the prescribed period. The Court clarified that the 15-day period for payment starts from the date the notice is received by the drawer or deemed served if returned unclaimed. In this case, the complaint was filed after the limitation period, and thus, it was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>