<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 476 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299698</link>
    <description>Acquisition of land for a co-operative housing society is treated as public purpose only where prior government approval of the housing scheme exists, and that approval operates as a condition precedent. Where the process was driven by intermediaries, involved payments to agents, and lacked meaningful control over allotment or construction, the acquisition was characterised as a colourable exercise of power and legally mala fide, rendering the notifications invalid. In a distinct factual setting, where no agreement with an agent or contractor to procure acquisition was shown, the matter was treated differently and relief was granted on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 476 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299698</link>
      <description>Acquisition of land for a co-operative housing society is treated as public purpose only where prior government approval of the housing scheme exists, and that approval operates as a condition precedent. Where the process was driven by intermediaries, involved payments to agents, and lacked meaningful control over allotment or construction, the acquisition was characterised as a colourable exercise of power and legally mala fide, rendering the notifications invalid. In a distinct factual setting, where no agreement with an agent or contractor to procure acquisition was shown, the matter was treated differently and relief was granted on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>