<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1097 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416331</link>
    <description>The court found the respondent&#039;s decision to terminate the contract justified but deemed the blacklisting unwarranted. The petitioner&#039;s financial struggles due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the restoration of the GST number were considered. The court emphasized the need for fairness and reasonableness towards small businesses, setting aside the blacklisting decision and urging the respondent to re-evaluate in light of the economic challenges faced post-COVID-19.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1097 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416331</link>
      <description>The court found the respondent&#039;s decision to terminate the contract justified but deemed the blacklisting unwarranted. The petitioner&#039;s financial struggles due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the restoration of the GST number were considered. The court emphasized the need for fairness and reasonableness towards small businesses, setting aside the blacklisting decision and urging the respondent to re-evaluate in light of the economic challenges faced post-COVID-19.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>