<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1063 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416297</link>
    <description>In a proposed amalgamation, the tribunal accepted dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors because consent affidavits satisfied the statutory majority threshold, including unanimous shareholder consent in one company and over 90% secured creditor value approval in both. However, it declined to dispense with the unsecured creditors&#039; meetings because no consent affidavits were produced for them and their liabilities remained substantial. The scheme therefore could proceed only with meetings of unsecured creditors being convened, while the other stakeholder meetings were validly dispensed with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1063 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416297</link>
      <description>In a proposed amalgamation, the tribunal accepted dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders and secured creditors because consent affidavits satisfied the statutory majority threshold, including unanimous shareholder consent in one company and over 90% secured creditor value approval in both. However, it declined to dispense with the unsecured creditors&#039; meetings because no consent affidavits were produced for them and their liabilities remained substantial. The scheme therefore could proceed only with meetings of unsecured creditors being convened, while the other stakeholder meetings were validly dispensed with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>