https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416287 The High Court partly allowed the writ petition by directing the parties to maintain the status quo regarding the subject matter of the impugned order until the petitioners file their appeal within two weeks. The respondent was restrained from taking coercive action against the petitioners based on the order dated 13.12.2021. The Court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the claims raised in the petition, and its order would merge with any future orders passed by the Tribunal on the appeal and stay application once it becomes functional. en-us Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Dec 2021 08:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416287 The High Court partly allowed the writ petition by directing the parties to maintain the status quo regarding the subject matter of the impugned order until the petitioners file their appeal within two weeks. The respondent was restrained from taking coercive action against the petitioners based on the order dated 13.12.2021. The Court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the claims raised in the petition, and its order would merge with any future orders passed by the Tribunal on the appeal and stay application once it becomes functional. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416287