https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416286 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service tax demand order, ruling that the petitioner's argument did not warrant invoking its writ jurisdiction. The Court highlighted the availability of an appeal remedy under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory route. It granted a three-week stay on coercive action but warned that failure to file an appeal would result in the stay being lifted. The Court concluded by disposing of the petition without awarding costs, closing any pending applications to conclude the legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Dec 2021 08:42:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416286 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service tax demand order, ruling that the petitioner's argument did not warrant invoking its writ jurisdiction. The Court highlighted the availability of an appeal remedy under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory route. It granted a three-week stay on coercive action but warned that failure to file an appeal would result in the stay being lifted. The Court concluded by disposing of the petition without awarding costs, closing any pending applications to conclude the legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416286