<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1565 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299686</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under Section 148 for assessment year 2014-15 was challenged on the ground that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction because the jurisdictional requirements were not satisfied. At the initial stage, the court allowed substitution of an annexure and gave the respondents time to take instructions and file a reply if necessary. Pending further hearing, the court granted ad-interim protection against the impugned notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1565 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299686</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under Section 148 for assessment year 2014-15 was challenged on the ground that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction because the jurisdictional requirements were not satisfied. At the initial stage, the court allowed substitution of an annexure and gave the respondents time to take instructions and file a reply if necessary. Pending further hearing, the court granted ad-interim protection against the impugned notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>