<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1031 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299688</link>
    <description>Allegations of GST evasion and fraudulent input tax credit through invoices from a purported fake entity were treated as a tax-evasion matter. The offence under the GST enactment was stated to be compoundable, and the applicant&#039;s readiness to compound was noted. On those facts, the Court considered the circumstances sufficient to justify bail and confirmed the interim protection already granted, holding the applicant entitled to regular bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1031 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299688</link>
      <description>Allegations of GST evasion and fraudulent input tax credit through invoices from a purported fake entity were treated as a tax-evasion matter. The offence under the GST enactment was stated to be compoundable, and the applicant&#039;s readiness to compound was noted. On those facts, the Court considered the circumstances sufficient to justify bail and confirmed the interim protection already granted, holding the applicant entitled to regular bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>