<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299672</link>
    <description>Non-service of a copy of a video cassette can render an election petition incomplete where the cassette is incorporated into the corrupt-practice pleading itself. Section 81(3) requires a true copy to be served on each respondent, and Section 86(1) mandates dismissal for non-compliance. Although a separate evidentiary document need not accompany a petition when the pleading is otherwise complete, omission becomes fatal when the document forms an integral part of the allegation and the corrupt practice cannot be fully understood without it. On that footing, the served copy was held not to be a true copy and dismissal was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299672</link>
      <description>Non-service of a copy of a video cassette can render an election petition incomplete where the cassette is incorporated into the corrupt-practice pleading itself. Section 81(3) requires a true copy to be served on each respondent, and Section 86(1) mandates dismissal for non-compliance. Although a separate evidentiary document need not accompany a petition when the pleading is otherwise complete, omission becomes fatal when the document forms an integral part of the allegation and the corrupt practice cannot be fully understood without it. On that footing, the served copy was held not to be a true copy and dismissal was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>