<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299672</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s judgment, dismissing the election petition due to non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The failure to provide a copy of a video cassette, deemed an integral part of the petition, prevented the first respondent from fully understanding or responding to the allegations. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299672</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s judgment, dismissing the election petition due to non-compliance with Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The failure to provide a copy of a video cassette, deemed an integral part of the petition, prevented the first respondent from fully understanding or responding to the allegations. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>