https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299669 Declaratory relief was treated as barred because an earlier adjudication had already negatived territorial jurisdiction, the same declaration had been pursued in prior proceedings without leave, and the relief sought would in any event bind only inter partes under the Specific Relief Act. The libel claim was also found unsustainable because the impugned publications were fair and accurate reports of judicial findings and were protected by privilege, leaving no arguable cause of action. The plaint was therefore rejected as maintainable neither in its declaratory nor damages aspect, and the proceedings ended with costs. en-us Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Dec 2021 18:09:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299669 Declaratory relief was treated as barred because an earlier adjudication had already negatived territorial jurisdiction, the same declaration had been pursued in prior proceedings without leave, and the relief sought would in any event bind only inter partes under the Specific Relief Act. The libel claim was also found unsustainable because the impugned publications were fair and accurate reports of judicial findings and were protected by privilege, leaving no arguable cause of action. The plaint was therefore rejected as maintainable neither in its declaratory nor damages aspect, and the proceedings ended with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299669