<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 293 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299662</link>
    <description>At the stage of framing of charge in a case instituted on a police report, the court must assess prima facie involvement on an overall appreciation of the investigation materials, not by isolating individual allegations. The court also must confine itself to the material forming part of the police report record under Section 173 CrPC and cannot rely on extraneous documents whose authenticity has not been examined. Applying that approach, the discharge was unsustainable because the lower court treated the matter as mere negligence and relied on letters outside the admissible record; the matter had to be reconsidered on the proper material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 14:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 293 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299662</link>
      <description>At the stage of framing of charge in a case instituted on a police report, the court must assess prima facie involvement on an overall appreciation of the investigation materials, not by isolating individual allegations. The court also must confine itself to the material forming part of the police report record under Section 173 CrPC and cannot rely on extraneous documents whose authenticity has not been examined. Applying that approach, the discharge was unsustainable because the lower court treated the matter as mere negligence and relied on letters outside the admissible record; the matter had to be reconsidered on the proper material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>