<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 293 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299662</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, set aside lower court orders, and directed a fresh proceeding in a case of criminal conspiracy and misappropriation by government officials. Lower courts were criticized for incomplete evidence use. The Trial Judge was told to follow proper legal procedures without influence from SC comments on case merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 14:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 293 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299662</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, set aside lower court orders, and directed a fresh proceeding in a case of criminal conspiracy and misappropriation by government officials. Lower courts were criticized for incomplete evidence use. The Trial Judge was told to follow proper legal procedures without influence from SC comments on case merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>