https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299657 The High Court held that anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 CrPC are maintainable even after a Magistrate has issued process or at the committal stage to the Sessions Court. The Court also ruled that interim orders restraining arrest under Section 438 CrPC are not permissible. The case was referred to the appropriate Single Judge for further proceedings. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Dec 2021 12:30:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299657 The High Court held that anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 CrPC are maintainable even after a Magistrate has issued process or at the committal stage to the Sessions Court. The Court also ruled that interim orders restraining arrest under Section 438 CrPC are not permissible. The case was referred to the appropriate Single Judge for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299657