<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299655</link>
    <description>Section 438 anticipatory bail remains maintainable where arrest is apprehended pursuant to a Magistrate-issued non-bailable warrant, because the source of the apprehension does not by itself exclude the statutory remedy. On the facts noted, anticipatory bail was also considered justified where the accused had earlier obtained bail in the connected matter, the later complaint was delayed, and there was no material showing risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. The article&#039;s ratio is that apprehension of arrest for a non-bailable offence is enough to invoke Section 438 unless the facts otherwise disqualify relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 11:50:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299655</link>
      <description>Section 438 anticipatory bail remains maintainable where arrest is apprehended pursuant to a Magistrate-issued non-bailable warrant, because the source of the apprehension does not by itself exclude the statutory remedy. On the facts noted, anticipatory bail was also considered justified where the accused had earlier obtained bail in the connected matter, the later complaint was delayed, and there was no material showing risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. The article&#039;s ratio is that apprehension of arrest for a non-bailable offence is enough to invoke Section 438 unless the facts otherwise disqualify relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>