<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299655</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure remains maintainable where arrest for a non-bailable offence is apprehended pursuant to a non-bailable warrant issued by a Magistrate. The source of the apprehended arrest does not remove Section 438 jurisdiction, and no statutory basis excludes the remedy merely because the warrant is court-issued rather than police-initiated. On the stated facts, prior bail in a matter arising from the same incident, delay in the subsequent complaint, and absence of material suggesting absconding, evidence tampering, or witness interference supported anticipatory bail. Protection from arrest was granted on appropriate terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 11:50:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299655</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure remains maintainable where arrest for a non-bailable offence is apprehended pursuant to a non-bailable warrant issued by a Magistrate. The source of the apprehended arrest does not remove Section 438 jurisdiction, and no statutory basis excludes the remedy merely because the warrant is court-issued rather than police-initiated. On the stated facts, prior bail in a matter arising from the same incident, delay in the subsequent complaint, and absence of material suggesting absconding, evidence tampering, or witness interference supported anticipatory bail. Protection from arrest was granted on appropriate terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>