https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299653 Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code was construed broadly to permit revision of an interlocutory order in a "case decided" where the subordinate court acts without jurisdiction, fails to exercise jurisdiction, or acts illegally or with material irregularity. Orders allowing or refusing amendment of pleadings, misconstruing remand directions, or omitting material issues may therefore be revisable in a fit case. The revisional power is not confined to final orders, but its exercise remains discretionary and must be guided by the facts of each case rather than any rigid rule. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:47:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299653 Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code was construed broadly to permit revision of an interlocutory order in a "case decided" where the subordinate court acts without jurisdiction, fails to exercise jurisdiction, or acts illegally or with material irregularity. Orders allowing or refusing amendment of pleadings, misconstruing remand directions, or omitting material issues may therefore be revisable in a fit case. The revisional power is not confined to final orders, but its exercise remains discretionary and must be guided by the facts of each case rather than any rigid rule. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Oct 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299653