<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1346 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision favoring the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-08 and 2010-11. The disputes over the commencement and completion dates of the housing project were resolved in favor of the assessee based on precedents and consistent application of the law. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, following the lead case&#039;s decision for 2007-08, as the facts and circumstances were similar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:35:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1346 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision favoring the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-08 and 2010-11. The disputes over the commencement and completion dates of the housing project were resolved in favor of the assessee based on precedents and consistent application of the law. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, following the lead case&#039;s decision for 2007-08, as the facts and circumstances were similar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>