<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1043 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and ordering the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the penalty for allegedly furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unwarranted, considering the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief in treating rental income as business income and the consistent reporting of income in previous assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1043 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and ordering the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the penalty for allegedly furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was unwarranted, considering the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief in treating rental income as business income and the consistent reporting of income in previous assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>