<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1041 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416275</link>
    <description>The court directed respondent No.1 to consider the petitioners&#039; representations dated 04.03.2020 on their merits, either by reopening the online portal or manually, within four weeks. Both writ petitions were allowed to this extent, emphasizing the need to prioritize substantive rights over procedural technicalities. Interlocutory applications, if any, were closed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2021 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1041 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416275</link>
      <description>The court directed respondent No.1 to consider the petitioners&#039; representations dated 04.03.2020 on their merits, either by reopening the online portal or manually, within four weeks. Both writ petitions were allowed to this extent, emphasizing the need to prioritize substantive rights over procedural technicalities. Interlocutory applications, if any, were closed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>