https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416244 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order as the Revenue failed to prove the case of clandestine removal of excisable goods beyond doubt. Lack of concrete evidence, reliance on unsigned documents, and denial of cross-examination requests led to the decision. Both appeals were allowed, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence in such cases. en-us Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Dec 2021 08:46:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416244 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order as the Revenue failed to prove the case of clandestine removal of excisable goods beyond doubt. Lack of concrete evidence, reliance on unsigned documents, and denial of cross-examination requests led to the decision. Both appeals were allowed, stressing the necessity of substantial evidence in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416244