<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27501</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, finding that the expenses incurred on the foreign tour of the senior partner&#039;s wife were personal and not allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed unsupported by evidence and unsustainable. The court emphasized that personal expenses cannot be claimed as business expenses, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue and ordering the assessee to pay costs to the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27501</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, finding that the expenses incurred on the foreign tour of the senior partner&#039;s wife were personal and not allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed unsupported by evidence and unsustainable. The court emphasized that personal expenses cannot be claimed as business expenses, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue and ordering the assessee to pay costs to the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>