https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299637 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside charges of forgery and misappropriation due to the absence of seized department files by the Income Tax Authority. The court refrained from commenting on the allegations under the Prevention of Corruption Act at that stage, as the petitioner intended to address it later. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Dec 2021 08:45:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299637 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside charges of forgery and misappropriation due to the absence of seized department files by the Income Tax Authority. The court refrained from commenting on the allegations under the Prevention of Corruption Act at that stage, as the petitioner intended to address it later. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299637