https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299642 The court granted an interim stay on further proceedings in a case where a movie theater owner challenged a notice regarding allegations of not passing on tax reduction benefits to customers under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner's concerns about the impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on their ability to respond were considered. The court directed the petitioner to submit an explanation within four weeks, allowing for defenses to be presented. The matter was disposed of without costs, with the court emphasizing the availability of a hearing opportunity and no severe consequences like arrest under Rule 133. en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Dec 2021 08:45:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299642 The court granted an interim stay on further proceedings in a case where a movie theater owner challenged a notice regarding allegations of not passing on tax reduction benefits to customers under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner's concerns about the impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on their ability to respond were considered. The court directed the petitioner to submit an explanation within four weeks, allowing for defenses to be presented. The matter was disposed of without costs, with the court emphasizing the availability of a hearing opportunity and no severe consequences like arrest under Rule 133. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299642