<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 680 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299632</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Transfer Petitions seeking transfer of criminal proceedings from Ghaziabad to Delhi, emphasizing that convenience or personal security concerns do not justify transfer. The Court found allegations of bias and interference in court proceedings to be baseless and cautioned against irresponsible insinuations. It concluded that the Petitioners would receive a fair trial in Ghaziabad and directed enforcement of safety measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 680 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299632</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Transfer Petitions seeking transfer of criminal proceedings from Ghaziabad to Delhi, emphasizing that convenience or personal security concerns do not justify transfer. The Court found allegations of bias and interference in court proceedings to be baseless and cautioned against irresponsible insinuations. It concluded that the Petitioners would receive a fair trial in Ghaziabad and directed enforcement of safety measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>