https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299629 For criminal breach of trust, prosecution must prove entrustment or dominion over property and subsequent dishonest misappropriation or conversion; it need not establish the exact manner of misappropriation. A perverse appreciation of evidence and an understanding of entrustment, including treating it as needing continuance until the time of misappropriation, can justify interference in revision. On that basis, material relating to cheques, bank evidence and a forensic report could not be discarded on unsound grounds, and the connected charges under Sections 420 and 468 IPC also required reconsideration. The acquittal was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh disposal after hearing both sides. en-us Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:10:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299629 For criminal breach of trust, prosecution must prove entrustment or dominion over property and subsequent dishonest misappropriation or conversion; it need not establish the exact manner of misappropriation. A perverse appreciation of evidence and an understanding of entrustment, including treating it as needing continuance until the time of misappropriation, can justify interference in revision. On that basis, material relating to cheques, bank evidence and a forensic report could not be discarded on unsound grounds, and the connected charges under Sections 420 and 468 IPC also required reconsideration. The acquittal was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh disposal after hearing both sides. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299629