<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 711 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299629</link>
    <description>The court set aside the acquittal order by the Judicial Magistrate in a case involving offences under sections 406, 420, and 468 IPC. The court found the acquittal to be based on erroneous interpretation and misappreciation of evidence, warranting interference. The case was remitted for fresh disposal with directions to re-evaluate the evidence within eight weeks. The accused was directed to appear before the court on a specified date, and the revision was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 711 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299629</link>
      <description>The court set aside the acquittal order by the Judicial Magistrate in a case involving offences under sections 406, 420, and 468 IPC. The court found the acquittal to be based on erroneous interpretation and misappreciation of evidence, warranting interference. The case was remitted for fresh disposal with directions to re-evaluate the evidence within eight weeks. The accused was directed to appear before the court on a specified date, and the revision was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>