<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 687 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299631</link>
    <description>Under the special bail restrictions for organised crime offences, bail may be refused only if the court is satisfied on broad probabilities that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is guilty and unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. On the material available, the Court treated the confessional statements as tentative, noted that some were not recorded in the statutory manner, and held that recovery of a vehicle from the accused&#039;s residence did not by itself establish culpability. As the surrounding circumstances did not support a strong inference of guilt and there was no adequate basis to foresee further organised crime, bail was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 687 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299631</link>
      <description>Under the special bail restrictions for organised crime offences, bail may be refused only if the court is satisfied on broad probabilities that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is guilty and unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. On the material available, the Court treated the confessional statements as tentative, noted that some were not recorded in the statutory manner, and held that recovery of a vehicle from the accused&#039;s residence did not by itself establish culpability. As the surrounding circumstances did not support a strong inference of guilt and there was no adequate basis to foresee further organised crime, bail was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>