<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 994 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416228</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, denial of benefits under Sections 11 and 12, and alleging a non-speaking order. It held that the impugned order did not cancel registration but highlighted the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide necessary documents. The court emphasized the availability of an alternate statutory remedy under the Income Tax Act, stating that the petitioner should exhaust such remedies before seeking writ jurisdiction. The court concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable and dismissed it, advising the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 994 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416228</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, denial of benefits under Sections 11 and 12, and alleging a non-speaking order. It held that the impugned order did not cancel registration but highlighted the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide necessary documents. The court emphasized the availability of an alternate statutory remedy under the Income Tax Act, stating that the petitioner should exhaust such remedies before seeking writ jurisdiction. The court concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable and dismissed it, advising the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>