<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 972 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 11,81,570/- made by the CPC towards employees&#039; contribution to ESI and PF. The contributions were deemed to be deposited before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1), in alignment with precedents set by the Rajasthan High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, cannot be applied retrospectively to the assessment year 2019-20.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:10:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 972 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 11,81,570/- made by the CPC towards employees&#039; contribution to ESI and PF. The contributions were deemed to be deposited before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1), in alignment with precedents set by the Rajasthan High Court. The Tribunal emphasized that the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, cannot be applied retrospectively to the assessment year 2019-20.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>