<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 796 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties under sections 271D and 271E for the assessment years 1995-96 to 1997-98. The CIT (A) had deleted the penalties, ruling that the amounts received were treated as income for taxation purposes, not as deposits or loans, thus not warranting penalties. The Tribunal agreed that once the amounts were considered as income, they could not be categorized as deposits for penalty purposes. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the penalties under sections 271D and 271E were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 796 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties under sections 271D and 271E for the assessment years 1995-96 to 1997-98. The CIT (A) had deleted the penalties, ruling that the amounts received were treated as income for taxation purposes, not as deposits or loans, thus not warranting penalties. The Tribunal agreed that once the amounts were considered as income, they could not be categorized as deposits for penalty purposes. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the penalties under sections 271D and 271E were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>