https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299622 A non-signatory parent company may be bound to arbitrate where it directly participated in contract formation and performance, derived direct benefit, and the record showed common commercial intention, implied consent, and sufficient control to invoke the group of companies doctrine. By contrast, a separate BoP work order issued under an independent arrangement and lacking an arbitration clause could not be treated as part of the BTG contract merely because the works were connected. The arbitration clause therefore extended to the BTG dispute but not to the BoP disputes, resulting in only partial referral to arbitration. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299622 A non-signatory parent company may be bound to arbitrate where it directly participated in contract formation and performance, derived direct benefit, and the record showed common commercial intention, implied consent, and sufficient control to invoke the group of companies doctrine. By contrast, a separate BoP work order issued under an independent arrangement and lacking an arbitration clause could not be treated as part of the BTG contract merely because the works were connected. The arbitration clause therefore extended to the BTG dispute but not to the BoP disputes, resulting in only partial referral to arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299622