https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299622 The court allowed the petition, holding that Indiabulls was bound by the arbitration agreement for the BTG Contract and should be referred to arbitration. Disputes related to the BoP Contract were not referred to arbitration due to the absence of an arbitration clause in that contract. The court directed the formation of an Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes related to the BTG Contract. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299622 The court allowed the petition, holding that Indiabulls was bound by the arbitration agreement for the BTG Contract and should be referred to arbitration. Disputes related to the BoP Contract were not referred to arbitration due to the absence of an arbitration clause in that contract. The court directed the formation of an Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes related to the BTG Contract. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299622