<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1318 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299623</link>
    <description>Tender review is confined to arbitrariness, irrationality, mala fides, bias, or unreasonableness in the decision-making process, and courts should not substitute their own technical or commercial view for that of the tendering authority. Allegations that specifications or eligibility conditions were tailor-made to favour particular bidders did not, by themselves, justify interference where the State acted fairly and in public interest. A bidder&#039;s non-controlling investment in another bidder did not establish a disqualifying conflict, and MSME or domestic enterprise preferences could not override the tender&#039;s eligibility . The tender challenge therefore failed on the grounds urged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1318 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299623</link>
      <description>Tender review is confined to arbitrariness, irrationality, mala fides, bias, or unreasonableness in the decision-making process, and courts should not substitute their own technical or commercial view for that of the tendering authority. Allegations that specifications or eligibility conditions were tailor-made to favour particular bidders did not, by themselves, justify interference where the State acted fairly and in public interest. A bidder&#039;s non-controlling investment in another bidder did not establish a disqualifying conflict, and MSME or domestic enterprise preferences could not override the tender&#039;s eligibility . The tender challenge therefore failed on the grounds urged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>