<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27485</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the reassessment under Section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on new information from an audit report, determining the assessee&#039;s resident status and applicability of income sources. It deemed the assessee a resident for the assessment year 1969-70 for all income sources, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation and affirming the Revenue&#039;s position, ordering the assessee to pay costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:23:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27485</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the reassessment under Section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on new information from an audit report, determining the assessee&#039;s resident status and applicability of income sources. It deemed the assessee a resident for the assessment year 1969-70 for all income sources, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation and affirming the Revenue&#039;s position, ordering the assessee to pay costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>