https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299605 Interference with an acquittal is permissible only when the trial court's view is perverse or contrary to the evidence, though the evidence may be reappraised to test the acquittal. Delay in lodging the FIR did not undermine the prosecution because the information was first recorded at the scene and the formal FIR was later taken at the police station, with the connected papers reaching the hospital promptly; absence of the FIR number on the inquest report did not show fabrication. The deceased's mother was accepted as a trustworthy eye-witness, corroborated by other witnesses and the investigating officer. The alleged defect in the Section 313 statement caused no prejudice. The conviction was upheld. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:11:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299605 Interference with an acquittal is permissible only when the trial court's view is perverse or contrary to the evidence, though the evidence may be reappraised to test the acquittal. Delay in lodging the FIR did not undermine the prosecution because the information was first recorded at the scene and the formal FIR was later taken at the police station, with the connected papers reaching the hospital promptly; absence of the FIR number on the inquest report did not show fabrication. The deceased's mother was accepted as a trustworthy eye-witness, corroborated by other witnesses and the investigating officer. The alleged defect in the Section 313 statement caused no prejudice. The conviction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299605