https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299604 An acquittal in appeal may be reversed only for substantial and compelling reasons. The appellate court may reappreciate the evidence, but it must give due weight to the trial court's assessment of witness credibility, the strengthened presumption of innocence after acquittal, and the accused's entitlement to reasonable doubt. If the trial court's view is reasonably possible and plausible, interference is unwarranted merely because another view is open. Interference is justified only where the appreciation of evidence is perverse, legally erroneous, ignores material evidence, rests on an impermissible view, or would result in miscarriage of justice. Applying that standard, the acquittal was affirmed. en-us Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:24:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299604 An acquittal in appeal may be reversed only for substantial and compelling reasons. The appellate court may reappreciate the evidence, but it must give due weight to the trial court's assessment of witness credibility, the strengthened presumption of innocence after acquittal, and the accused's entitlement to reasonable doubt. If the trial court's view is reasonably possible and plausible, interference is unwarranted merely because another view is open. Interference is justified only where the appreciation of evidence is perverse, legally erroneous, ignores material evidence, rests on an impermissible view, or would result in miscarriage of justice. Applying that standard, the acquittal was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299604