https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299601 The appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was dismissed. The court upheld the lower court's decision to acquit the accused due to the lack of proof of a legally enforceable debt and non-recoverable loan amount. The court found discrepancies in the complainant's evidence, inconsistencies in statements, and the absence of corroborative evidence. The accused's denial of receiving any loan and the lack of supporting documentation led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the respondent's bail bond discharged. en-us Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299601 The appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was dismissed. The court upheld the lower court's decision to acquit the accused due to the lack of proof of a legally enforceable debt and non-recoverable loan amount. The court found discrepancies in the complainant's evidence, inconsistencies in statements, and the absence of corroborative evidence. The accused's denial of receiving any loan and the lack of supporting documentation led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the respondent's bail bond discharged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299601