<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 540 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299598</link>
    <description>The appellate court confirmed the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the accused, as the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant failed to prove that the cheques were issued for consideration or in discharge of any debt or liability. The appellate court found no error in the trial court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the appeals, upholding the acquittal orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:34:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 540 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299598</link>
      <description>The appellate court confirmed the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the accused, as the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant failed to prove that the cheques were issued for consideration or in discharge of any debt or liability. The appellate court found no error in the trial court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the appeals, upholding the acquittal orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>