https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299599 The High Court held that it could not entertain a petition under Article 227 when the Revision Application remedy had not been exhausted. The court emphasized the limited scope of its powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the need for caution in invoking these powers. The judgment clarified that the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 should not be used to bypass statutory remedies, except in cases of gross abuse of process of law. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:34:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299599 The High Court held that it could not entertain a petition under Article 227 when the Revision Application remedy had not been exhausted. The court emphasized the limited scope of its powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the need for caution in invoking these powers. The judgment clarified that the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 should not be used to bypass statutory remedies, except in cases of gross abuse of process of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299599