https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299599 The availability of a revisional remedy under Section 397 CrPC does not absolutely bar invocation of Article 227 or Section 482, but both jurisdictions are discretionary and should be used sparingly, especially where an efficacious statutory remedy exists. Because the petitioner had not exhausted the revision remedy against the order issuing process, the High Court found no basis for interference at that stage and treated the petition as not maintainable. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:34:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299599 The availability of a revisional remedy under Section 397 CrPC does not absolutely bar invocation of Article 227 or Section 482, but both jurisdictions are discretionary and should be used sparingly, especially where an efficacious statutory remedy exists. Because the petitioner had not exhausted the revision remedy against the order issuing process, the High Court found no basis for interference at that stage and treated the petition as not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299599