<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 853 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299597</link>
    <description>The penalty appeal for AY 2004-05 was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A). For the assessee&#039;s appeals for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08, various grounds were rejected, but some were allowed based on previous decisions and legal precedents. The revenue&#039;s appeals for the same years were also dismissed as the Tribunal ruled against the revenue on multiple issues. Overall, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 853 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299597</link>
      <description>The penalty appeal for AY 2004-05 was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) by the CIT(A). For the assessee&#039;s appeals for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08, various grounds were rejected, but some were allowed based on previous decisions and legal precedents. The revenue&#039;s appeals for the same years were also dismissed as the Tribunal ruled against the revenue on multiple issues. Overall, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>