<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 950 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416184</link>
    <description>The judge granted the petitioner regular bail in a case involving alleged evasion of State Tax under Sections 69 and 132(1) of the Punjab Goods and Service Act, 2017. The petitioner, accused of fraudulent activities causing a loss of Rs. 8.95 crore to the State Government, denied involvement and argued false implication. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, the judge found no purpose in keeping the petitioner in custody, granting bail upon execution of bonds worth Rs. 5 lakh. The decision emphasized that it did not reflect an opinion on the case&#039;s merits, requiring the petitioner to surrender any passport and seek court permission before leaving India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 950 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416184</link>
      <description>The judge granted the petitioner regular bail in a case involving alleged evasion of State Tax under Sections 69 and 132(1) of the Punjab Goods and Service Act, 2017. The petitioner, accused of fraudulent activities causing a loss of Rs. 8.95 crore to the State Government, denied involvement and argued false implication. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, the judge found no purpose in keeping the petitioner in custody, granting bail upon execution of bonds worth Rs. 5 lakh. The decision emphasized that it did not reflect an opinion on the case&#039;s merits, requiring the petitioner to surrender any passport and seek court permission before leaving India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>