<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 949 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416183</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the stay application, emphasizing the principle of lis pendens to govern the duty paid by the petitioners until further orders. The Court found that the pending writ petition would not lose relevance without an interim order, ensuring the petition&#039;s efficacy through lis pendens. The decision was based on territorial jurisdiction assessment and legal principles applied to the ongoing litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 949 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416183</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the stay application, emphasizing the principle of lis pendens to govern the duty paid by the petitioners until further orders. The Court found that the pending writ petition would not lose relevance without an interim order, ensuring the petition&#039;s efficacy through lis pendens. The decision was based on territorial jurisdiction assessment and legal principles applied to the ongoing litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>