<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 946 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416180</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration specifically for the assessment year 2007-08. The Court emphasized the need for a more detailed analysis of the issues related to the levy of penalty and the validity of the notice, leaving the substantial questions of law open for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 946 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416180</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration specifically for the assessment year 2007-08. The Court emphasized the need for a more detailed analysis of the issues related to the levy of penalty and the validity of the notice, leaving the substantial questions of law open for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>