<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 916 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416150</link>
    <description>The appellant was granted entitlement to benefits under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. for re-importing goods originally exported under a duty drawback scheme and MEIS. The appellate authority found that the appellant had fulfilled the conditions of the notification and was entitled to the benefits. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 916 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416150</link>
      <description>The appellant was granted entitlement to benefits under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. for re-importing goods originally exported under a duty drawback scheme and MEIS. The appellate authority found that the appellant had fulfilled the conditions of the notification and was entitled to the benefits. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>