<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 910 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority has the jurisdiction to allow objectors/interveners to file objections before admitting a pre-packaged insolvency resolution process application. It emphasized adherence to natural justice principles and the power to regulate its own procedure. The Tribunal found a breach of statutory requirements in the meeting notice period for Financial Creditors. Allegations of fraudulent treatment and misrecording of votes raised valid concerns about meeting and approval process validity. The Tribunal stressed the importance of natural justice and procedural fairness, dismissing the appeal and leaving the decision on the application to the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 910 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority has the jurisdiction to allow objectors/interveners to file objections before admitting a pre-packaged insolvency resolution process application. It emphasized adherence to natural justice principles and the power to regulate its own procedure. The Tribunal found a breach of statutory requirements in the meeting notice period for Financial Creditors. Allegations of fraudulent treatment and misrecording of votes raised valid concerns about meeting and approval process validity. The Tribunal stressed the importance of natural justice and procedural fairness, dismissing the appeal and leaving the decision on the application to the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>