https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416143 The tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, ruling that the appellants failed to demonstrate due diligence and good faith in prosecuting the writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The appeal was found to be time-barred under Section 61 of the IBC, as the appellants had sufficient time to file the appeal before the NCLAT. Consequently, the appeal and all pending interlocutory applications were dismissed without costs. en-us Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:49:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416143 The tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, ruling that the appellants failed to demonstrate due diligence and good faith in prosecuting the writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The appeal was found to be time-barred under Section 61 of the IBC, as the appellants had sufficient time to file the appeal before the NCLAT. Consequently, the appeal and all pending interlocutory applications were dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416143