<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 907 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416141</link>
    <description>Section 9 insolvency relief was found unavailable because the application was beyond limitation on the pleaded facts, and the attempt to characterise the default as continuing was rejected. Annual listing fees were also treated as regulatory dues, not operational debt, so they could not support insolvency proceedings under the Code. The Tribunal therefore held that such dues, if recoverable at all, must be pursued through the regulatory framework rather than as an operational debt. The prior decision relied on by the appellant was found inapplicable on the facts, and the order refusing admission of insolvency was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 907 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416141</link>
      <description>Section 9 insolvency relief was found unavailable because the application was beyond limitation on the pleaded facts, and the attempt to characterise the default as continuing was rejected. Annual listing fees were also treated as regulatory dues, not operational debt, so they could not support insolvency proceedings under the Code. The Tribunal therefore held that such dues, if recoverable at all, must be pursued through the regulatory framework rather than as an operational debt. The prior decision relied on by the appellant was found inapplicable on the facts, and the order refusing admission of insolvency was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>