https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416131 The court held that the trial court at Bijapur had territorial jurisdiction to try the case based on the location of the loan transaction and relevant activities. The court upheld the conviction and sentence, noting the lack of defense evidence from the petitioner to rebut the complainant's claims. Additionally, the High Court declined to exercise revisional jurisdiction, finding no legal errors in the lower courts' judgments. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:49:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416131 The court held that the trial court at Bijapur had territorial jurisdiction to try the case based on the location of the loan transaction and relevant activities. The court upheld the conviction and sentence, noting the lack of defense evidence from the petitioner to rebut the complainant's claims. Additionally, the High Court declined to exercise revisional jurisdiction, finding no legal errors in the lower courts' judgments. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416131