https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416131 Territorial jurisdiction for a cheque dishonour complaint was upheld where the loan transaction, cheque delivery, presentation, account maintenance, and related correspondence were connected with Bijapur, and the cheque was treated as delivered for collection through the complainant's branch account there. The amended jurisdiction scheme under the Negotiable Instruments Act applied, so the earlier rule in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod did not assist the accused on these facts. Revisional interference was also refused because such interference lies only for illegality or perversity, and the conviction was supported by documentary evidence while the defence of alteration and blank cheque remained unproved. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:49:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416131 Territorial jurisdiction for a cheque dishonour complaint was upheld where the loan transaction, cheque delivery, presentation, account maintenance, and related correspondence were connected with Bijapur, and the cheque was treated as delivered for collection through the complainant's branch account there. The amended jurisdiction scheme under the Negotiable Instruments Act applied, so the earlier rule in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod did not assist the accused on these facts. Revisional interference was also refused because such interference lies only for illegality or perversity, and the conviction was supported by documentary evidence while the defence of alteration and blank cheque remained unproved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416131