https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416129 The Court upheld the trial Court's decision, dismissing the CRMP seeking special leave to appeal against the respondent's acquittal from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The Court found the complainant's evidence lacking in establishing the transactions clearly, noting discrepancies in the statements regarding the loan amount and dates. Emphasizing the accused's right to challenge the existence of a debt, the burden of proof was shifted to the complainant, who failed to conclusively prove the debt, leading to the lawful and non-perverse judgment of acquittal. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416129 The Court upheld the trial Court's decision, dismissing the CRMP seeking special leave to appeal against the respondent's acquittal from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The Court found the complainant's evidence lacking in establishing the transactions clearly, noting discrepancies in the statements regarding the loan amount and dates. Emphasizing the accused's right to challenge the existence of a debt, the burden of proof was shifted to the complainant, who failed to conclusively prove the debt, leading to the lawful and non-perverse judgment of acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416129