https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416126 The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was analysed as applying retroactively to ongoing projects, with that extension upheld as a valid consumer-protective regulation. The text distinguishes refund from compensation: refund claims under Sections 12, 14, 18 and 19 lie before the Regulatory Authority, while compensation matters fall within the Adjudicating Officer's exclusive domain. It also states that the Authority may validly delegate Section 31 complaints to a single member, that the promoter pre-deposit requirement for appeals is reasonable and enforceable, and that refundable amounts determined under the Act may be recovered as arrears of land revenue. en-us Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416126 The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was analysed as applying retroactively to ongoing projects, with that extension upheld as a valid consumer-protective regulation. The text distinguishes refund from compensation: refund claims under Sections 12, 14, 18 and 19 lie before the Regulatory Authority, while compensation matters fall within the Adjudicating Officer's exclusive domain. It also states that the Authority may validly delegate Section 31 complaints to a single member, that the promoter pre-deposit requirement for appeals is reasonable and enforceable, and that refundable amounts determined under the Act may be recovered as arrears of land revenue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416126