https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299587 In proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the High Court declined to invoke Section 311 CrPC to re-summon the complainant for re-examination. The Court noted that the accused had already disclosed the defence in his Section 313 CrPC statement and had examined defence witnesses, and held that the existing defence evidence was sufficient to address the complainant's evidence and rebut the presumption under Section 139. In view of the stage of the case and the material already on record, no sufficient ground was made out for recall of the complainant, and the request was rejected. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:38:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299587 In proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the High Court declined to invoke Section 311 CrPC to re-summon the complainant for re-examination. The Court noted that the accused had already disclosed the defence in his Section 313 CrPC statement and had examined defence witnesses, and held that the existing defence evidence was sufficient to address the complainant's evidence and rebut the presumption under Section 139. In view of the stage of the case and the material already on record, no sufficient ground was made out for recall of the complainant, and the request was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299587