https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299590 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court. It held that the assignment deed was invalid under both the Trade Marks Act and the Banking Regulation Act, and thus, the suit filed by respondent No.1 was dismissed. The court reiterated that statutory prohibitions and jurisdictional issues are exceptions to the doctrine of res judicata, ensuring that illegal or erroneous decisions do not attain finality. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Mar 2022 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299590 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court. It held that the assignment deed was invalid under both the Trade Marks Act and the Banking Regulation Act, and thus, the suit filed by respondent No.1 was dismissed. The court reiterated that statutory prohibitions and jurisdictional issues are exceptions to the doctrine of res judicata, ensuring that illegal or erroneous decisions do not attain finality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299590